UtterAccess.com
X   Site Message
(Message will auto close in 2 seconds)

Welcome to UtterAccess! Please ( Login   or   Register )

Custom Search
 
   Reply to this topicStart new topic
> Reddick-gray Unified Naming Convention., Any Version    
 
   
Jaiket
post Dec 21 2017, 05:01 AM
Post#1



Posts: 125
Joined: 3-May 17
From: France


Hello,
Looking through publications about naming conventions, the most recent thing I can find is the Reddick-Gray unified one. I can't find a single comment on them anywhere, except one broken link in UA which recommends them. I am currently implementing Reddick-Gray simply because it is more recent then the others I could find, which is not a valid reason.

Does anyone here recommend or discourage Reddick-Gray unified?

--------------------
UA = Unsurpassable Assistance. Couldn't do it without you.
Go to the top of the page
 
DanielPineault
post Dec 21 2017, 05:48 AM
Post#2


UtterAccess VIP
Posts: 5,525
Joined: 30-June 11



It's not a question of which convention you use, it is more a question that you follow a naming convention, any naming convention. You can even use your own if you like. It is more about following a standard that you, and others, can follow throughout your coding. It makes understanding code much simpler.

Also, just because it is newer, doesn't make it any better, or worse. It just makes it newer.


Have you seen



just for more option.


and then there is always theAccessWeb's http://access.mvps.org/access/general/gen0012.htm

--------------------
Daniel Pineault (2010-2017 Microsoft MVP)
Professional Help: http://www.cardaconsultants.com
Free MS Access Code, Tips, Tricks and Samples: http://www.devhut.net

* Design should never say "Look at me". It should always say "Look at this". -- David Craib
* A user interface is like a joke, if you have to explain it, it's not that good! -- Martin LeBlanc


All code samples, demonstration databases, links,... are provided 'AS IS' and are to be used at your own risk! Take the necessary steps to check, validate ...
Go to the top of the page
 
GroverParkGeorge
post Dec 21 2017, 06:26 AM
Post#3


UA Admin
Posts: 31,598
Joined: 20-June 02
From: Newcastle, WA


I wholeheartedly agree with Daniel.

The point of a naming convention is that all of the names in YOUR projects are consistent. Beyond that, you are free to adopt whatever seems most comfortable, or logical, or cool to you.

Besides, if you start chasing the most recent naming convention, won't you end up changing your own names from time to time, thereby leading to inconsistent naming across generations of your work?

--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 


Custom Search
RSSSearch   Top   Lo-Fi    19th January 2018 - 02:45 AM