thomrosewwb
May 18 2011, 05:12 PM
So I can't put a subform in a continuous form. Why is beyond me, but I have pretty much accepted it. I want to represent data in a form something like this:
Transaction Header Information
---Transaction Detail Information
---Transaction Detail Information
---Transaction Detail Information
Transaction Header Information
---Transaction Detail Information
Transaction Header Information
---Transaction Detail Information
---Transaction Detail Information
Transaction Header Information
Transaction Header Information
Each of the detail items refers to the header information above it. I want to be able to see headers in a continuous format. My requirement would be easily accomplished if I could put a subform in a continuous form. Since I can't do that, is there a good workaround?
theDBguy
May 18 2011, 05:17 PM
Hi,
Probably not the answer you are looking for but you can do that in a Report.
Does it have to be a form?
Just my 2 cents...
thomrosewwb
May 18 2011, 06:07 PM
I think it does need to be a form. I want to be able to update the data.
Jeff B.
May 18 2011, 06:49 PM
What's the underlying business need?
Do you really need to see all those transaction headers, or just a single one, with its detail (subform) records?
thomrosewwb
May 19 2011, 08:48 AM
I don't HAVE to see all those headers, but it makes things easier for the user. If I did not want to see all those headers, I understand how to easily accomplish that.
John Spencer
May 19 2011, 08:55 AM
You could use a single form with a subform to show the transaction detail records.
In the Form header, display a listbox with the information for the transaction header.
When the user clicks on a row in the listbox, change the Transaction record in the form (and the linked subform details should automatically update)
thomrosewwb
May 19 2011, 11:01 AM
Thanks, John. That seems to be the best I can do. I pretty much did what you suggested except I put the transaction header information in its own continuous form subform, with a separate subform for the associated transaction detail.
theDBguy
May 19 2011, 11:59 AM
Hi Thom,
Just in case you are interested, check out this
previous post from Gord.
Hope that helps...
This is a "lo-fi" version of our main content. To view the full version with more information, formatting and images, please
click here.